Which of the following reflects a consequence of high-profile crime media coverage?

High-profile crime media coverage often leads to confusion about the fairness of legal processes. This occurs because sensationalized reporting can create a narrative that oversimplifies complex legal issues, portrays individuals as guilty before a trial, and emphasizes certain dramatic elements over the nuanced realities of the judicial system.

When media focuses heavily on specific cases, it can skew public perception, leading individuals to question the integrity and impartiality of the legal system. This confusion may stem from the portrayal of trials, plea deals, or the handling of evidence, making it difficult for the public to understand the principles of justice and due process.

In contrast, other options such as increased public empathy for criminals, enhanced public trust in law enforcement, or greater recognition of victim rights do not encapsulate the primary consequence of sensational crime media coverage. Instead, they may occur under different circumstances or from different influences, rather than as a direct result of the way high-profile crimes are reported in the media.