Who are typically the most subject to surveillance?

Inequities in societal structures often lead to certain populations being more susceptible to surveillance, and impoverished individuals typically fall into this category. This heightened level of surveillance is often a reflection of systemic issues, including socioeconomic disparities, which result in marginalized communities being monitored more closely than their affluent or middle-class counterparts.

Impoverished individuals frequently reside in areas where crime rates are perceived to be higher, leading to increased police presence and scrutiny. Additionally, due to a lack of resources and social capital, these individuals may not have the same ability to advocate against intrusive surveillance practices. The implementation of surveillance technologies, such as cameras in public housing or focused policing strategies in lower-income neighborhoods, further exacerbates the feeling of being constantly watched.

In contrast, other groups, such as affluent individuals, may possess means and status that allow them to evade certain types of scrutiny, often relying on private security rather than public surveillance. Middle class workers, while they may experience workplace surveillance, do not experience the same pervasive societal scrutiny based on their socioeconomic status. Government officials might also be closely monitored due to their positions, but this surveillance is often institutional rather than societal.

Therefore, the dynamics of power, social hierarchy, and the perception of safety and crime contribute to why impover